-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 snowcrash+gnupg-users wrote:
> if my purpose it to impart additional 'confidence' in "B" to _others_, > by signing it with "A", then i would *NOT* want to 'lsign', but rather > just sign/tsign, *and* publish the pubkey for "A". > > correct? YES, this would do it; however, proper etiquette would be to *not* send B's Key to the Servers, but rather to returned it 'Signed' to B and let B make any 'publication' decisions/actions. There are folks who are _very_ picky about their Keys being in General Circulation! JOHN :-\ Timestamp: Sunday 28 Jan 2007, 14:06 --500 (Eastern Standard Time) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7-svn4405: (MingW32) Comment: Public Key at: http://tinyurl.com/8cpho Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org Comment: My Homepage: http://tinyurl.com/yzhbhx iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJFvPRBAAoJEBCGy9eAtCsPxncH/Alj8Z2e+Gq+FU80R6kUOl6X gMh+l7cCvd3NMwXibwXTiDcJoSoecfsaPwxhhPYqyfWacbrPFTPJl/eHd9TlW4fJ fzuuudtwnA59Xftx/v9qmzFLKZaOpXbC9LQegxokKs88LGqhL/DiPX4un4rP/xaG ahYr+ZPM3UnYVGvV/hEUkAuZxZlSwRwf6ZJ8BleGbqMe2r6UBlOxdh6x9hPm9dTt xJk4c4c/xEYqD1iVhdfIg7gVVHgX2iJ+kGcNANaKRP+R0F0SJ86wufTzWrps6YkM 57p2c2UhyNdL+RzgIPX+1dacSMD6HMhe07V+m2iim7gyGv5fSbiL7Dg5TvNo3LQ= =UZgm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
