At Thu, 06 Oct 2005 20:29:04 +0000,
"William M. Perkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> GnuPG version: 1.4.2, min. 1.2.2
Ah, ok. I only tested it with GnuPG 1.4.1, which worked fine.
> The failure happened at:
> t-sig-notation.c:108: Missing or duplicate notation data
> FAIL: t-sig-notation
GnuPG 1.4.2 has a stricter check for critical notation data. Sigh.
The below patch is now in CVS Head, and will be part of 1.1.1. If you
want, give it a try. Otherwise just ignore the broken test, it has no
effect on how GPGME works.
2005-10-07 Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* gpg/t-sig-notation.c: Change critical notation to something
GnuPG understands.
diff -ru gpgme/tests/gpg/t-sig-notation.c gpgme/tests/gpg/t-sig-notation.c
--- gpgme/tests/gpg/t-sig-notation.c 2005-10-01 04:06:08.000000000 +0200
+++ gpgme/tests/gpg/t-sig-notation.c 2005-10-07 01:00:02.000000000 +0200
@@ -42,8 +42,8 @@
{ "[EMAIL PROTECTED]",
"Just Squeeze Me",
GPGME_SIG_NOTATION_HUMAN_READABLE },
- { "[EMAIL PROTECTED]",
- "Right Now",
+ { "[EMAIL PROTECTED]",
+ "pgpmime",
GPGME_SIG_NOTATION_HUMAN_READABLE | GPGME_SIG_NOTATION_CRITICAL },
{ NULL,
"http://www.gnu.org/policy/";,
Thanks,
Marcus
_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
