On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 09:59:53AM -0500, John Clizbe wrote: > David Shaw wrote: > > There is perhaps an argument to be made for a "super clean" that does > > clean and also removes any signature where the signing key is not > > present (in fact, an early version of clean did that), but that's a > > different thing than clean. > > Perhaps --scrub ? --sanitize ? --disinfect ?
I rather like "minimize", but this isn't really a minimal key (as it has signatures other than selfsigs). David _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
