Alphax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Zeljko Vrba wrote: >> Joe Smith wrote: >>> For example, your CA can revoke your key leaving you with one key that >>> is invalid X.509, but valid OpenPGP? Yuck! >>> >> Using the X.509 cert and OpenPGP public key (having the same private >> key) could be useful in the following scenario: > >Is that even allowed??
SPENGLER (emphatic): Don't cross PGP and X.509. VENKMAN: Why not? SPENGLER: Trust me. It will be bad. VENKMAN: What do you mean "bad?" SPENGLER: It's hard to explain, but try to imagine Werner appearing suddenly and beating you to death with a large copy of the GNU manifesto. VENKMAN (with military authority): That's it! No X.509. You guys are dangerous. Peter. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
