Hello, Now that PGP 9 beta seems to have extended the standard to allow non-160 bit hashes to be used with DSA keys, isn't it time for GnuPG to do the same, especially after the recent attacks on SHA-1? I know it's against the standard, but the expansion of the standard is pretty straightforward and not due to interpretation problems. After all, the official standard is often a reflection of the behaviour of specific programs anyway.
And while this is being provessed, Tiger might be re-included too, since the arguments against its 192 bits size are then no longer relevant. -- ir. J.C.A. Wevers // Physics and science fiction site: [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.xs4all.nl/~johanw/index.html PGP/GPG public keys at http://www.xs4all.nl/~johanw/pgpkeys.html _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
