Christian Grothoff <groth...@gnunet.org> writes: > I don't see how the anonymity level of FS can possibly be > abstracted/used in other services. The anonymity level tries to capture > the available cover traffic, and only traffic that is basically > "indistinguishable" in terms of the origin should count. As (for > example) CADET messages identify the origin, they cannot reasonably use > that notion.
That's what I wanted to know. I was thinking about something along the lines of having multiple egos and wanting to "hide" the activity of each ego, to avoid associating each of them with the same peer. I thought the anonimity mechanism used by FS could help, but I only know about it at a very high level, so I don't know all the implications. Thank you for clarifying, A.V.
