You’re presumably using GnuCash 5.9-1. It’s 5.9-2 that has the wrong LSMinimumSystemVersion value. That’s OK, the difference is to work around a linking bug in macOS 15.2’s Writing Tools; users of older macOS versions don’t need it.
Regards, John Ralls > On Dec 8, 2024, at 23:15, G R Hewitt <hewit...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Just dropping in that I am running GC version 5.9 on a mid 2010 MacPro 5.1 > running High Sierra 10.13 without a problem. > > On Sun, 8 Dec 2024 at 21:51, Frederick Bambrough <ml...@ypical.co.uk> wrote: > >> In message <mpro.snrwus002mw0200fk.ml...@ypical.co.uk> >> on 30 Nov 2024 you wrote: >> >>> The GnuCash download page shows >>> >>> 'GnuCash 5.9 for Apple macOS Intel ≥ 10.13—"High Sierra"'. >>> >>> Opening the dmg file on MacOS Mojave, 10.14.6, shows the GnuCash icon >>> with a prohibited symbol. Why? >>> >>> Is it that the content of the disk image is incorrect or does the web >>> site need updating to show a later OS version required? >> >> Running this version of GnuCash generates the error that this version >> requires MacOS 11.0 or later. >> >> -- >> Frederick >> _______________________________________________ >> gnucash-user mailing list >> gnucash-user@gnucash.org >> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: >> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user >> ----- >> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. >> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. >> > _______________________________________________ > gnucash-user mailing list > gnucash-user@gnucash.org > To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user > ----- > Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. > You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
