That length of time indicates that it is getting into some sort of weird loop for each security being fetched and then it waits to time out each one of those fetch call.
There are number of things you can try to narrow down the issue on your system: - See if you can time the fetch of single quote using the CLI that is provided with GNUCash. - Start with a blank file and then define just one or two securities. BK and BRK-A are good to start with and time that. - Run GNUCash in a debug mode and enable trace mode to capture the output to see if there is something not so right. Some odd reason it feels like you are on a Linux Distro and it might be setup to auto configure for a proxy server but one does not exist. Although it wound ’t take that length of time to timeout. Last thing that I can think is that your Perl distribution is busted badly enough and might need a fresh install. What version of GNUCash, and on which type and version of OS are running on? From: Fred Tydeman <tydeman.f...@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2024 7:08 PM To: Kalpesh Patel <kalpesh.pa...@usa.net> Cc: R Losey <rlo...@gmail.com>; Gnucash Users <gnucash-user@gnucash.org> Subject: Re: [GNC] Get Quotes hung On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 11:38 AM Kalpesh Patel <kalpesh.pa...@usa.net <mailto:kalpesh.pa...@usa.net> > wrote: I am not seeing such delays and completes in about a minute. I do see failures now and then and that has all to do with Yahoo performing maintenance on their systems and is transient in nature. Silly question I'll ask: did you verify that all those stocks are getting data from Yahoo and Yahoo only via yahoo_json as a single source? You aren't running any VPN session, knowingly or unknowingly, right? No VPN. All stocks are getting from yahoo. _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
