Agree, however we could argue that the software allowed the data file to be damaged and should handle its own mess!
On Tue, 23 Nov 2021, 9:57 am Adrien Monteleone, < adrien.montele...@lusfiber.net> wrote: > I wouldn't advocate for such a change, and at least in this case, it > really is/was a payment. (I made the invoice when I received the bill, > then entered the payment when I physically paid it) > > And had that band-aid been in place, I would have been unlikely to > discover this discrepancy. > > Regards, > Adrien > > On 11/22/21 7:37 PM, Christopher Lam wrote: > > The report could also be amended to silently handle these "invoice" type > > transactions without an attached invoice, and handle them as payment type > > instead. But this is a bad band aid. > > _______________________________________________ > gnucash-user mailing list > gnucash-user@gnucash.org > To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user > If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see > https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. > ----- > Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. > You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. > _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
