The question is about custom changes to the sorting algorithm (with an undocumented feature) and I'm questioning actually using a *non-standard* sorting algorithm. Using the 80:20 rule most of the benefit of the system comes from a small part of it. How can GnuCash evolve if custom code is carried forward forever? That may well involve a major change and as Will pointed out it is easy to add leading zeros.
----- "The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) is Australia's central bank... It does this by conducting monetary policy" https://www.rba.gov.au/about-rba/ > https://www.rba.gov.au/speeches/2020/sp-ag-2020-06-03.html#there-are-a-number-of-policy-implications > https://www.rba.gov.au/speeches/2020/images/sp-ag-2020-06-03-graph01.gif > "Is this suggesting the end of the cheque system? I think it may well > be..." -- Sent from: http://gnucash.1415818.n4.nabble.com/GnuCash-User-f1415819.html _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
