For those that care, it is perfectly easy to have numbers sort correctly with an alphanumeric sort, simply include the leading zeros. If you think your check numbers will never exceed 1000, just number the checks: 0001, 0002,... 0100, 0101, etc.If you expect to write more than 1000, add another leading 0.
Will On 2021 Jun 10, at 06-10 01:40:24, flywire <flywi...@gmail.com> wrote: How can special customisation to sort a GnuCash field be justified when it makes future transitions even more difficult? This field should be sorted in a standard way. It's clearly the old *numeric* field for sorting cheques, and the banks tell us cheques are as good as dead. When it was changed to alphanumeric the sort order should have changed too, ie 10 before 2. I note David's comment on current functionality. Significant changes should occur at major versions. -- Sent from: http://gnucash.1415818.n4.nabble.com/GnuCash-User-f1415819.html _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
