Michael, I'm not sure what behavior you think I am seeing? I do think you're missing my point, which is that prior to 4.5, automatically-generated entries for Imbalance-USD would be placed in my existing Imbalance-USD account, which is located under Special Accounts. That is, "Special Accounts: Imbalance-USD". It doesn't do that any more, and instead insists that all such entries be made only into a top level account.
I'm not interested in having multiple Imbalance-USD accounts littering my CoA (let alone any additional top level Imbalance-XXX accounts for any other currencies my books might track); I am looking for Gnucash to use the Imbalance accounts that already exist. David -------- Original Message -------- From: Michael or Penny Novack <stepbystepf...@comcast.net> Sent: Mon May 31 17:36:23 EDT 2021 To: gnucash-user@gnucash.org Subject: Re: [GNC] New Imbalance-XXX Behavior On 5/31/2021 1:08 PM, David T. via gnucash-user wrote: > Please re-read my email. In it you will see that I am NOT/NOT asking > about how to handle entries that are automatically added to > Imbalance-USD. I am fully aware of Gnucash behaviors in regard to the > creation of entries into Imbalance-USD, and I have a long-established > workflow in place for handling such created entries. > > > What I was noting is a CHANGE IN BEHAVIOR from earlier versions of > Gnucash. In earlier versions, entries to Imbalance-USD would be added > to the EXISTING Imbalance-USD account, regardless of its placement in > the Chart of Accounts. In my books, I moved Imbalance-USD to be a > child account of a new Top Level account that I created called > "Special Accounts." David, for a very good reason, I suspect you were not seeing the behavior you thought you were seeing. An account is NOT defined by its name but by its name within the context of its position in the tree (the CoA). Does you CoA not have ANY account names that are duplicated except for their position in the tree? For example, suppose among your expenses you were tracking the costs associated with automobiles, with one of these being fuel. Expenses Automobile expenses Auto 1 fuel Auto 2 fuel Now those two accounts for fuel have the same name but they are NOT the same account. You would not expect to simply specify "fuel" as the account affected by a transaction but also which one you meant. But you are saying you had this working for the name "Imbalance". That you moved this to a different place in the tree but gnucash still treated it as the same account as the normal (special account) Imbalance. Michael D Novack _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
