Looking at the example again, it still isn’t clear what the OP aims to accomplish or why. (maybe this isn’t even the right rabbit hole)
If they want to only delete transactions in AccountA that *do not* also include splits with AccountB and AccountC, but do include splits with Expense:E and Expense:F then probably two successive Find operations would need to be done to narrow the result properly. (or just visually skip them when deleting) Otherwise as David noted, AccountB and AccountC will also see those transactions disappear and be affected. This might even be a case where the target transactions should be found, then one-by-one, edited manually to exclude splits to Expense:E & Expense:F and re-balance each transaction between only AccountA, B, & C. Regards, Adrien _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
