Am 13.11.2014 um 18:55 schrieb Christoph Holtermann: > Am 13.11.2014 um 17:50 schrieb Christian Stimming (mobil): >> From my understanding, there are two separate issues here: >> >> 1. You are proposing a new object "Company" because you have reasons for >> needing new data fields. I think that's a good idea. Why don't you prepare a >> patch to extend the existing objects? >> >> 2. You ask for kvp access from python. No, we prefer not to have kvp >> accessed from python. Instead, either use gobject properties (on master), or >> add a new object on the C side as mentioned above and add python wrappers >> for this. > Surely adding an object on the C side would be the more robust approach. Can > you tell me an object that already exists > and that could be taken as an example ? I'll try gncAddress as a start. > > I don't really understand the gobject concept though and what the difference > to my approach is. > > It seems some work until we have something we're all happy with, though ;-) >> Regards, Christian >> -- >> Sent from mobile. > regards, > > Christoph >
-- --- Nachricht gesendet von C. Holtermann --- - - - Verschlüsselte Nachrichten können über - - den öffentlichen Schlüssel auf folgendem - - Keyserver an mich gesendet werden: - http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x4DD9CF0482B0620B _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
