Am 13.11.2014 um 17:50 schrieb Christian Stimming (mobil): > From my understanding, there are two separate issues here: > > 1. You are proposing a new object "Company" because you have reasons for > needing new data fields. I think that's a good idea. Why don't you prepare a > patch to extend the existing objects? > > 2. You ask for kvp access from python. No, we prefer not to have kvp accessed > from python. Instead, either use gobject properties (on master), or add a new > object on the C side as mentioned above and add python wrappers for this. Surely adding an object on the C side would be the more robust approach. Can you tell me an object that already exists and that could be taken as an example ?
I don't really understand the gobject concept though and what the difference to my approach is. It seems some work until we have something we're all happy with, though ;-) > > Regards, Christian > -- > Sent from mobile. regards, Christoph -- --- Nachricht gesendet von C. Holtermann --- - - - Verschlüsselte Nachrichten können über - - den öffentlichen Schlüssel auf folgendem - - Keyserver an mich gesendet werden: - http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x4DD9CF0482B0620B _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
