John Ralls <jra...@ceridwen.us> writes:
>> As for Gtkmm, it's just a C++ interface wrapped around Gtk+. If we're
>> dumping Gtk+ because we don't like the direction they're going, Gtkmm
>> doesn't get us anywhere.
>
> Having argued that C++ in the backend in not such a big deal, I'm
> going to turn around and point out that dropping Gtk+ in favor of wx,
> Qt, or some other GUI framework isn't a easy job: That *is* a complete
> rewrite, and there's a lot of it.
>
> Who would do it?
I was just pointing out that if we had to spend a lot of time migrating
to Gtk3 we might be better off spending the time migrating to something
else.
I still wish I had written QOF in C++ instead of C a decade ago. :-(
> Regards,
> John Ralls
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
warl...@mit.edu PGP key available
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
