On 26 January 2012 16:58, Geert Janssens <janssens-ge...@telenet.be> wrote: > Op donderdag 26 januari 2012 15:34:32 schreef Colin Law: >> On 25 January 2012 16:54, Colin Law <clan...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> > It seems I have been barking up the wrong tree here. I have built the >> > trunk from git and it runs fine, without setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH. >> > Moreover if I remove libgnome.so it still runs fine. I have checked >> > that the only instance of libgnome.so on the system is the one in >> > /usr/lib/libglade/2.0. So the question appears to be not why can the >> > 2.4 build not find the library at run time, but why is it looking for >> > it? >> >> Not knowing where to go from here I tried the base of the 2.4 branch >> and was surprised to find that it also fails. As I said above the tip >> of trunk is ok. Now starting a bisect on the trunk to see where the >> problem went away on the trunk. Obviously it is going to take a >> little time as I am doing a clean build at each one. >> >> If anyone had a brainwave it would be helpful. To summarize the problem. >> Building the 2.4 branch on Ubuntu 12.04 I find that when gnucash is >> run it cannot find libnome.so unless I set LD_LIBRARY_PATH >> Building the tip of trunk does not have this problem. >> Building the base of 2.4 branch *does* have the problem so something >> has changed on the trunk since then to fix it. >> The problem is not seen on Ubuntu 11.10 >> > Additionally you could also check what the result is of > ldd /usr/lib/libglade/2.0/libgnome.so > and if this reports some missing libraries. From how everything is installed, > it looks like libglade is dlopening the libraries in /usr/lib/libglade/2.0/ > manually on demand, which might fail if libgnome.so is missing some > dependencies. I don't know for sure, just thinking out loud. > > By the way, on Fedora 16, libgnome.so is installed via libgnomeui.
libgnome.so is installed via libgnomeui-0 ldd shows a big list of dependencies but is not showing anything obviously wrong. Would it be obvious if something were missing? Colin _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
