Am Dienstag, 1. November 2011 schrieb John Ralls: > It seems that a few years ago, Phil ran SPLint [1] on the code base and > added a bunch of annotations to suppress bogus errors. (They're the /*@ > foo @*/ comments. Later, Christian started running astyle, which put all > of those comments on a separate line from the code they annotated. > > I think, from reading the manual, that having the annotations on a separate > line breaks them. Does anyone know for sure?
I don't know. > Is anyone still running SPLint? Have an opinion about static analysis in > general? I'm not running it now. Neither I've done before. In general, I think static analysis is a good additional tool to improve the overall code quality. Best Regards, Christian _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
