Mike Alexander <m...@umich.edu> writes:
> --On December 11, 2010 9:08:11 PM -0800 John Ralls
> <jra...@ceridwen.us> wrote:
>
>> Yes, and conceptually it makes sense for gnc-version.h (and its
>> companion, gnc-svnrevision.h) to be in core-utils instead of
>> gnome-utils. Neither has anything at all to do with gnome. I'll do
>> that tomorrow morning.
>
> I just checked in a change that does that. With luck I didn't break
> things too badly. It required changing some of the scripts used to
> generate the Windows install files. Since I don't have a Windows
> machine to build on, I couldn't test that. Someone should see if the
> Windows build still works. I did run "make distcheck" to see if
> things were ok in the Unix build. It looks like this hasn't been done
> for a while since it found some other errors.
I ran a complete make all check from scratch and it worked fine, so the
only potential problem might be existing build trees. They might wind
up getting these files in multiple locations.
> Mike
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
warl...@mit.edu PGP key available
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
