On Nov 19, 2010, at 12:48 AM, Geert Janssens wrote: > On Thursday 18 November 2010, Geert Janssens wrote: >> On Monday 15 November 2010, Derek Atkins wrote: >>> "David T." <sunfis...@yahoo.com> writes: >>>> I am curious why 2.4 would be held up for a lack of compiled help >>>> under Windows. Help has NEVER worked for me under OS X, and it's >>>> always been a separate package in Linux. So why would this hold up the >>>> release for the REST of us? >>> >>> Because it *was* working and broke, so it's a regression. >>> >>>> David >>> >>> -derek >> >> I have committed a patch today for the Windows build system. This should >> fix the missing help on Windows. We'll see tomorrow when the next nightly >> build has run. >> >> Geert >> _______________________________________________ >> gnucash-devel mailing list >> gnucash-devel@gnucash.org >> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel > > The windows build has run successfully with my patch and includes the > documentation again. > > This means the last remaining bug on the 2.4 list has been fixed. > > Time for another release candidate ? > > If that candidate doesn't reveal new issues, it can become 2.4. >
Good. Is everyone comfortable with [1] the bugs filed since the release of 2.3.16 and [2] the 24 bugs reporting crashes? (I'm not wild about releasing with known crashers, but I'm willing to be overruled.) Is the documentation ready? What about translations? We can do another RC without them, but they're needed for the actual release. If we're happy about the bug situation, we could even make the 2.4 branch so that people who've been holding back changes can commit to trunk again. Regards, John Ralls [1] http://tinyurl.com/26maqo3 [2] http://tinyurl.com/293vgam _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
