John Ralls <jra...@ceridwen.us> writes:
> On Sep 15, 2009, at 7:31 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
>
> John Ralls <jra...@ceridwen.us> writes:
>
> After reading the bug report it doesn't sound to me like they were
> actively trying to not make xquartz work, but rather they didn't
> understand what was going on.
>
> Perhaps supplying an alternate patch based on their HEADrev might
> appease them?
>
> It's sort of like someone coming here and submitting a patch to 2.2.6
> (or 2.0.5) -- we just don't care about it anymore. But if they supply a
> patch to 2.3.5 or HEADrev we're more likely to look.
>
> No, it's not like that. It's like I submitted a patch against trunk and said
> in the bug report that I'd tested it against 2.3.3, but had checked the code
> in trunk and it hadn't changed.
>
> Anyway, your suggestion of a counter-patch against trunk is worth trying, so I
> will.
Thank you!! I appreciate your persistence! :-D
> Regards,
> John Ralls
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
warl...@mit.edu PGP key available
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
