On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 8:49 AM, Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Tom Browder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> We try really hard not to load our tree with dependencies.  There
>>> are, however, times when we do need to for one reason or another.
>>> So I wouldn't rule it out, but honestly I'd rather see it working
>>> using an installed docbook tree.
>>
>> Derek, I'm happy to try to do a Makefile patch, but I'm still trying
>> to determine the problem.
>>
>> Is there a known correct solution using the docbook-xml stylesheets
>> with the current gnucash-docs xml source?
>>
>> If so, can you point me to it.
>
> Honestly I'd have to go google through the email archives to
> find the work someone else did to find the right invocation
> to use the docbook schema.  So unfortunately no, I cannot really
> point you at it easily.  Sorry.

Thanks, Derek.  I just wanted to make sure how the situation stands
'cause I don't want to reinvent wheels here.  I'll check back in if I
make any progress.

-Tom
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel

Reply via email to