On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 7:37 AM, Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Tom Browder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ... >> On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 7:49 AM, Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... >> What I meant is that maybe whatever it takes (within reason) to make >> the correct pdf should be in the gnucash-docs source tree instead of >> trying to find it with the autotools. > > Ah, I see. Well, I suppose that's an option too. > >> Otherwise it seems that the right Makefile entries depend on finding >> the right inputs in a set of many possibilities. > > True, but it's pretty easy to write a configure scriptlet that > says something like: > > if [ -d /path/to/place1 ] ; then > docbookargs="-- place 1" > elif [ -d /path/to/place2 ] ; then > docbookargs="-- place 2" > ... > > We try really hard not to load our tree with dependencies. There > are, however, times when we do need to for one reason or another. > So I wouldn't rule it out, but honestly I'd rather see it working > using an installed docbook tree.
Derek, I'm happy to try to do a Makefile patch, but I'm still trying to determine the problem. Is there a known correct solution using the docbook-xml stylesheets with the current gnucash-docs xml source? If so, can you point me to it. Thanks. -Tom _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
