On Jan 8, 2008 5:02 AM, Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Charles Day" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > For your consideration, I've attached a patch that allows QIF split > > transactions with zero in the "T" line to pass through without sign > reversal > > (also described above). > > Would it make sense to provide a boolean checkbox somewhere in the > druid if we find one of these transactions to ask the user how to > treat them? >
When encountering a zero-sum split transaction that also zero in the "T" line, probably the most appropriate thing to ask the user would be: "Hey moron, why on Earth would you enter a transaction in account X's register when that account isn't even involved?" Possible answers: (a) The devil made me do it. (b) Intuit forced me to do it as a workaround (same as (a) above) (c) You're right, I'm a moron. ;) -Charles > -derek > _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
