Sorry about the misattribution - I think Derek suggested the checkbox. And yes, I am offering to collect at least the issues I am running across and write them up for posterity. There is nothing earth shattering (my biggest problems were fixed by patches that have already been committed).
- Bill On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, William D. Hamblen wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Ian Lewis wrote: > >>> "Charles Day" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> >>> Would it make sense to provide a boolean checkbox somewhere in the >>> druid if we find one of these transactions to ask the user how to >>> treat them? >> >> Unfortunately, I'm not sure the user would know unless you start asking >> stuff like, "Was this QIF created with Money Dance or <insert bad QIF making >> Quicken version here>?" > > Maybe recording the fact that this issue (and others like it) exist > would be worthy of an entry in the wiki? I imagine one of the more > common uses of the QIF importer is people coming from other applications > and while that will almost never work perfectly because of the nature of > QIFs, knowing where to look for problem transactions is still very > useful. I've now got a list of problems with my QIF file that have to > be fixed by hand but I've also repaired a number of transactions in > Quicken so they will import correctly. > > - Bill > _______________________________________________ > gnucash-devel mailing list > gnucash-devel@gnucash.org > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel > _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
