-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Derek Atkins schrieb: > I suspect the swig-redo branch will get merged back into trunk > in a week or two... I was wondering that myself, but I'm not > sure we should.
If the merging work is done anyway very soon in the branch -> trunk direction, then indeed we don't have to do this in the trunk -> branch direction anyway. I'm looking forward to this. Great job! Christian > > -derek > > Quoting Christian Stimming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > With all these changes in the Makefiles, I was wondering whether the > swig-redo branch has already or should merge the changes in trunk that > were related to the g-wrap wrapper generation, i.e. avoiding the need to > symlink generation? That's 14746, 14747, 14763, 14764, 14766, 14767, and > eventually 14804. I saw the swig-redo branch was copied from r14658. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQCVAwUBRS5cbWXAi+BfhivFAQI7rwP/WZMSddy+LnwjIPicQ+1y3yC6a3olbVPm JtscDcmuMDTjEldaWDCuIXBE4mQgcOxq74+hIMITc/I9JMRSNwL/2s2Blplgujbt ba0gLzbAJ3AKi6Qkw8Vdhl18tNShgyk0TTVj0+MGokhNjrnqZrEgRaQnWPl0l3lD 2nuhKi0kD3g= =4GUz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
