I suspect the swig-redo branch will get merged back into trunk in a week or two... I was wondering that myself, but I'm not sure we should.
-derek Quoting Christian Stimming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > With all these changes in the Makefiles, I was wondering whether the > swig-redo branch has already or should merge the changes in trunk that > were related to the g-wrap wrapper generation, i.e. avoiding the need to > symlink generation? That's 14746, 14747, 14763, 14764, 14766, 14767, and > eventually 14804. I saw the swig-redo branch was copied from r14658. > > Christian > > Derek Atkins schrieb: >> Author: warlord >> Date: 2006-10-10 19:08:31 -0400 (Tue, 10 Oct 2006) >> New Revision: 14997 >> Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/14997 >> >> Modified: >> gnucash/branches/swig-redo/configure.in >> gnucash/branches/swig-redo/src/app-utils/Makefile.am >> gnucash/branches/swig-redo/src/app-utils/test/Makefile.am >> ... > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (MingW32) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iQCVAwUBRS4BlWXAi+BfhivFAQKfVwP/bmL/+0ywiaPM3Lu0+2/QVMEOwkvtxmXU > 2WYqfQfdgVrLBUZr1qVyaQ8LED+l20tsgedw58dl+BkbclVBd/HQpNnxNptc1aIQ > ZRsJhWA50aTOwir81DTIAAu1iwR48WqHsqA53zMLMKXFr3IBVfCOGc2BoIE9+lPy > sYlZrWsoG5Y= > =NOxr > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > gnucash-devel mailing list > gnucash-devel@gnucash.org > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel > -- Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB) URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
