On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 12:21:57PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote: > Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >"At best"? If I touched ChangeLog as I edited files, like you > >suggest, I'd constantly be remaking POTFILES.in. How's that for a > >reason not to add ChangeLog as a dependency for anything being remade? > > I'd rather it rebuild too often and make the build take a little longer > than not rebuild it often enough and blow out the build when a file is > removed.
But how could it break? If you built it once, and then removed a file, `make pot` wouldn't break because it remake POTFILES.in, and `make` wouldn't break because po/ is up-to-date. The only thing that could break is going into po and using an explicit make target, and ONLY IF _YOU'RE_ THE ONE who removed the file since the last `make pot'. C'mon. -chris _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
