Sorry to be dense. Isn't there some way to have the DB store the current balance with each record? That way the current balence would just be the current balence from the last record. Or is that more expensive than I realise? Phill "Al B. Snell" wrote: > That was one of three proposals :-) > > The third proposal was to keep all the old data, but to guarantee that the > balances of all accounts bar the special "carrying" equity account go to > zero at the period boundary, so a search for the current balance (adding > up all splits on an account) need only go back to that checkpoint _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnumatic.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
- Re: Salutations Derek Atkins
- File store (was Re: Salutations) Phillip Shelton
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutations) Al Snell
- RE: File store (was Re: Salutations) Phillip Shelton
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutations) Bill Gribble
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutations) Al B. Snell
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutations) Bill Gribble
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutations) Al B. Snell
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutations) Bill Gribble
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutations) Al B. Snell
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutations) Phillip J Shelton
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutations) Steve Greenland
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutations) David Merrill
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutations) Derek Atkins
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutations) Al Snell
- RE: File store (was Re: Salutations) Phillip Shelton
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutations) David Merrill
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutations) Derek Atkins
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutations) David Merrill
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutations) Derek Atkins
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutations) David Merrill