On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 02:28:15PM +0000, Al B. Snell wrote: > Yes. I quite like the idea of havnig a "period" number in the transaction > records and, at the increment of each period, creating transactions that > transfer the balance of each account to an equity account, and then > transferring it back again after the increment, meaning that all accounts > start the period with a zero balance. > > If a query goes back before the period boundary, everything will balance > with no extra work required. Right, but that doesn't help you generate a graph of weekly bank balances over 5 years. This is a hard problem, and it's one I think needs to be addressed. b.g. _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnumatic.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
- Re: Salutations David Merrill
- Re: Salutations Steve Greenland
- Re: Salutations Rob Browning
- Re: Salutations David Merrill
- Re: Salutations Derek Atkins
- File store (was Re: Salutations) Phillip Shelton
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutation... Al Snell
- RE: File store (was Re: Salutation... Phillip Shelton
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutation... Bill Gribble
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutation... Al B. Snell
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutation... Bill Gribble
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutation... Al B. Snell
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutation... Bill Gribble
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutation... Al B. Snell
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutation... Phillip J Shelton
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutation... Steve Greenland
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutation... David Merrill
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutation... Derek Atkins
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutation... Al Snell
- RE: File store (was Re: Salutation... Phillip Shelton
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutation... David Merrill