On Sat, Jun 03, 2000 at 10:20:40AM -0700, Peter C. Norton wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 03, 2000 at 05:01:51AM -0500, Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
> > I agree. Using gint32 rather than int only solves part of the problem.
> > foo_t is much more flexible.It reduces the architecture dependency to a
> > single point in the code.
> How is this different from using already-created typedefs in glib? glib
> seems to provide a lot of the types necessary, already done.
I think the point is that you might decide to change the size of one
of the types at some point.
--Dylan
--
Gnucash Developer's List
To unsubscribe send empty email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
