On Sat, 03 Jun 2000, Robert Graham Merkel wrote:
> Christopher Browne writes:
>  > What GnuCash probably needs is to _pervasively_ use gint32 rather than
>  > int, gnit32 rather than long, and such.  Of course, someone has to
>  > volunteer to do the global-search-and-replace on this sort of thing...
>
> Before we do that *too* globally, it'd probably be nice to set up
> wrapping these types with g-wrap.
>
> Additionally, for many of the quantities we pass around, might it not
> be a good idea to define a typedef for them, analagous to
> the foo_t types in the C libraries?

I agree. Using gint32 rather than int only solves part of the problem.
foo_t is much more flexible.It reduces the architecture dependency to a 
single point in the code.

--
Gnucash Developer's List
To unsubscribe send empty email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to