Would it make sense to compile the engine code as a library, then
create the Palm tool as a separate binary and link to the engine
library? It sounds like this Palm tool would only need access to
the engine code.
Gerald
Robert Graham Merkel wrote:
>
> I've just got myself a shiny new Palm IIIx, and I'd really like to add
> the ability to download transactions from its expense tracker.
> I've located a library called pilot-link which would make writing
> this simple, but as we have all agreed, adding new runtime
> dependancies is a Bad Thing, particularly for something that is
> useless unless you have a Palm.
>
> Is it possible to build a single binary that can detect whether
> a library is present and continue running (without that functionality
> of course) if it's not there? Or will I have to build a seperate
> binary - and, if so, what's the best method for doing the
> inter-process communication?
>
> --
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Robert Merkel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> What a strange game. The only winning move is not to play.
> -- WOP, "War Games"
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Gnucash Developer's List
To unsubscribe send empty email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]