>>>>> On 08 Feb 2000 15:14:14 -0600, Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> said:
rlb> Dave Peticolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> That is cool, but I think it would be better to use the ':' key
>> instead of TAB. TAB is already used and rebinding it for certain
>> cells would be confusing. The ':' key seems more intuitive since
>> that is the character that we are completing to.
rlb> Well, for this kind of thing <TAB> is what most people are going
rlb> to expect for completion, but even more people are going to
rlb> expect <TAB> to move between fields. Further, we can't really
rlb> overload <TAB> to do both (complete if we're not done, and move
rlb> on if we are) since there are points of ambiguity.
rlb> So, while I definitely think we should make it configurable, how
rlb> about using Ctrl-<TAB> (we can't use Shift because everyone
rlb> expects that to be "go back one field") for completion and <TAB>
rlb> for next field? That would work OK for me. How about you, Rob?
C-e is much more intuitive for me to "go to end of <foo>", where foo
is area, line, section. but ctrl-tab is better than "end".
rob
--
Gnucash Developer's List
To unsubscribe send empty email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
