On 2 Jun 1999, Matt Armstrong wrote: > Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ... > As a prospective developer though, I'm not interested in dealing in > the extra effort involved with the kinds of customizability you're > talking about. It makes the program harder to docuent, debug and test > since the guts of it are opened up for everyone to touch and > manipulate. I am much more interested in working on a program without > a scripting language. Maybe this program is not GnuCash. You have valid points. OTOH, I am very unlikely to get involved in any serious way with GnuCash development, as I simply don't have the time. However, once it becomes something I can use at all (I can't get it to not crash immediately), I might easily see some smallish feature that would be useful to me. If there is no extension language, I may submit a feature request for one of the serious developers to implement. If there is an easily approachable extension language, such that I don't have to dig into the guts, but can just get called as a hook, or whatever, I may well just go ahead and implement the feature. I feel confident saying this, because I have at times done just this with emacs, and would not have been willing to edit emacs's c source and recompile to do it. Of course, normal usage should not involve writing code, and GnuCash should be highly useable without knowing the extension language, how to compile anything, etc. (I suspect that everyone agrees on this bit.) > So those are my thoughts. They are just the impressions of one guy, > so I wouldn't put a lot of weight behind them. They should have as much weight as mine--possibly more, as you label yourself as a "prospective developer", while I do not. -- Todd Greer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----- %< -------------------------------------------- >% ------ The GnuCash / X-Accountant Mailing List To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put "unsubscribe gnucash-devel [EMAIL PROTECTED]" in the body
Re: Simpler financial package: gnofin
Todd Greer Wed, 2 Jun 1999 13:44:12 -0500 (Central Daylight Time)
- Re: Simpler financial package: gnofin linas
- Re: Simpler financial package: gnofin Rob Browning
- portfolio code (was Re: Simpler financial ... linas
- crontabs linas
- Re: crontabs Alexandru Harsanyi
- Re: crontabs Rob Browning
- Re: crontabs Jeremy Collins
- Re: crontabs Rob Browning
- Re: crontabs Chris Ingram
- Re: crontabs linas
- Scheme as the scripting language (was Re:.... Todd Greer
- Scheme as the scripting language (was Re:...) Alexandru Harsanyi
- Re: Scheme as the scripting language (was Re:...) Jesse D. Sightler
- Re: Scheme as the scripting language (was Re:.... Rob Browning
- Re: Scheme as the scripting language (was ... Jesse D. Sightler
- Re: Scheme as the scripting language (was ... Alexandru Harsanyi
- Re: Scheme as the scripting language (was ... linas
- Re: Scheme as the scripting language (was ... Matt Armstrong
- Re: Scheme as the scripting language (was ... Jesse D. Sightler
- Re: Simpler financial package: gnofin linas
- Re: Simpler financial package: gnofin Jeremy Collins