Jeremy Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I think the guile integration will both turn some people away and
> > allow others to contribute at the same time.
> >
>
> Turns me off, but who am I? ;)
OK. I'd like to take this opportunity to have a DTR (Define the
Relationship). What I'd like to know is if there's anyone else on the
list who's actually in favor of or interested in the guile stuff (even
if only conceptually -- whether or not it's "quite right" yet).
I'm pretty gung-ho about it, but I don't want to be ramming it down
everyone else's throat if I'm the only one who thinks that it's a good
idea. If I am the only one, then I'll be happy to back out all that
stuff and shut up about it.
Note though, that in all honesty, if that happens, I'll probably still
contribute some to GnuCash, but I probably won't be a heavy
contributor. Though I might consider, if I find others who are
interested, working on a parallel (forked?) experimental project
that's uses guile.
This is *not* intended to be inflammatory or anything else. I just
wanted to find out if I'm causing people more problems than I'm
solving, and if so, do something about it.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930
----- %< -------------------------------------------- >% ------
The GnuCash / X-Accountant Mailing List
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
put "unsubscribe gnucash-devel [EMAIL PROTECTED]" in the body