On 2 March 2012 22:03, Mark Blakeney <mark.blake...@bullet-systems.net> wrote: > On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 09:43:20 -0600, Josh Leverette wrote: >> I agree it's the right way forward, but users don't see it that way >> and there's no reason to force it. > > Josh, why is it the "right way forward"? Can somebody please provide a > link to an intelligent argument why this design choice makes sense? >
Hi, The important point you need to start from is that the gnome developers are right and you are wrong - after that it's a lot easier to come up with reasons - as lots of people do. For example There is no shutdown because shutting down is a bad fashion choice and the shell police have decided that reprobates will just have to "sudo shutdown" and once you try not shutting down for a while you'll understand unless you are too old or not clever enough or not open to new design concepts and work flows. Don't forget you can also just add a hotkey.... </sarcasm> Regards, Tim -- You could help some brave and decent people to have access to uncensored news by making a donation at: http://www.thezimbabwean.co.uk/friends/ _______________________________________________ gnome-shell-list mailing list gnome-shell-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
