I don't care what the reasoning behind it is. Why can't somebody put an option in the settings dialog? why are we forcing this down people's throats? I agree it's the right way forward, but users don't see it that way and there's no reason to force it.
Sincerely, Josh On Mar 2, 2012 9:26 AM, "Juan Manuel Santos" <vicariou...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, March 02, 2012 13:40:19 Ross Burton wrote: > > On 2 March 2012 13:19, Adam Tauno Williams > <awill...@whitemice.org> wrote: > > >> I like and promote gnome-shell but frankly it is embarrassing to > have to > > >> apologise for this design choice to new users. It leaves an > awkward first > > >> impression. > > > > > > So enable the extension that changes the behavior, then be > happy. > > > <https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/5/alternative-status- > menu/> > > > > Or press the button that you used to turn it on. Desktop computers > > are the only devices in the world (that I can think of) where the > > "off" button traditionally isn't the same as the "on" button. > > > > Ross > > I by no means wish to bring this subject back into the mailing list, but I > think he referred to discussion among developers (actually, I believe it > would be designers) regarding this feature when it was first brought > up/implemented. > > Anyway, from what I understand, I think most designer's discussions > are made via IRC, so good luck finding a log on that :( > > Cheers > Juan Manuel > _______________________________________________ > gnome-shell-list mailing list > gnome-shell-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list >
_______________________________________________ gnome-shell-list mailing list gnome-shell-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
