On 9 December 2011 21:24, Tim Murphy <tnmur...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, I have used them all and they're all deficient in one way or > another. I have also used twm, FVWM, ROX, sawfish, gnome1, cde, > Nextstep, GEM, OSX, GNOME2, GEOS, OS/2, BeOS and half a dozen other > things and GNOME2 is the least bad that I could find on linux - > actually pretty good really.
I'm still not sure why nobody has stepped up and offered to maintain the GNOME 2.x series going forwards. So many people seem to dislike GNOME 3 but nobody seems willing to continue supporting GNOME 2 (and the MATE fork doesn't count). Ross _______________________________________________ gnome-shell-list mailing list gnome-shell-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
