Am Mittwoch, den 09.11.2011, 21:26 +0100 schrieb Kenneth Nielsen: > Den 09-11-2011 20:16, Gil Forcada skrev: > > El dc 09 de 11 de 2011 a les 16:47 +0100, en/na Kenneth Nielsen va > > escriure: > >> Den 09-11-2011 16:14, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy skrev: > >>> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Kenneth Nielsen<k.nielse...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>>> Den 09-11-2011 09:45, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy skrev:
> >> commit should roughly equal the following number of strings: > >> > >> number_of_updated_strings_per_cycle/(number_of_modules * > >> number_of_updates_per_module_in_a_cycle) > >> > point was exactly, that the number of commits should make a perfectly > reasonably metric for _comparisons_ of activity, which can be used for > the kind of "general terms" measurements that you are talking about. Hi I tend to strongly disagree here; very little conclusions can be drawn from looking at the numbers of commits, even considering the total number of strings updated in a 6 month release cycle. Commits can be anything between adding yourself to the list of translators and adding a new, entirely translated file of fivethousand new strings, I do not see the benefit of looking at the number of commits. Correct me if I am wrong. Is it not just the plain number of words in strings translated that matter? Or less precise, the number of strings translated? -- Christian Kirbach <christian.kirb...@googlemail.com> _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
