Le mardi 27 septembre 2011 à 07:42 +0200, Milan Crha a écrit : > On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 22:26 -0700, Johannes Schmid wrote: > > Hi! > > > > > I'm sorry, that wasn't intentional. Can I "fix" it by unmarking the > > > string from translation for 3.2.x? This one shouldn't be shown to a user > > > often, it's rather rare string, when a syntax of a filter doesn't match, > > > which can happen only if a developer develops new filters, I believe. > > > > Just request a freeze-break for 3.2.1. Unmarking the string doesn't fix > > it but just creates another bug (string not marked for translation...). > > As you probably doing that and I think that is fine to fix in 3.2.1, 1 > > of 2 from i18n. > > Hi, > OK, I'm sorry for inconvenience and thanks for the suggestion and "1 of > 2". I'm asking for the freeze break "officially" now. :) > > If I understand it correctly, and because I messed it and committed > already, then if I get the second approval then I can just let it be > (nothing more would be needed from my side), only if there will not be > the second approval, then I should revert the commit in the gnome-3-2 > branch of eds. Is it correct? > Bye, > Milan
Approval 2 of 2. Go in peace :-) Claude _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
