On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 22:26 -0700, Johannes Schmid wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > I'm sorry, that wasn't intentional. Can I "fix" it by unmarking the
> > string from translation for 3.2.x? This one shouldn't be shown to a user
> > often, it's rather rare string, when a syntax of a filter doesn't match,
> > which can happen only if a developer develops new filters, I believe.
>
> Just request a freeze-break for 3.2.1. Unmarking the string doesn't fix
> it but just creates another bug (string not marked for translation...).
> As you probably doing that and I think that is fine to fix in 3.2.1, 1
> of 2 from i18n.
Hi,
OK, I'm sorry for inconvenience and thanks for the suggestion and "1 of
2". I'm asking for the freeze break "officially" now. :)
If I understand it correctly, and because I messed it and committed
already, then if I get the second approval then I can just let it be
(nothing more would be needed from my side), only if there will not be
the second approval, then I should revert the commit in the gnome-3-2
branch of eds. Is it correct?
Bye,
Milan
_______________________________________________
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
