Hi Wouter, Thanks for update. I would like to ask why is this discussed in private?
Johannes said that the new ML will be only for coordinators, so I assume that you are discussing this there. Does this also mean that Marcel, as Coordinator of Slovak team, is discussing this with you and we are excluded? I also agree that splitting team is not a good idea and we should try to resolve this so we keep one team, but more productive and relatively happy. Thanks Laco On 17 May 2010 19:47, Wouter Bolsterlee <wbols...@gnome.org> wrote: > Op maandag 17-05-2010 om 06:24 uur [tijdzone +0000], schreef > j...@jsschmid.de: >> > So, to elaborate on your suggestion, the team would be split [...] >> Sorry, splitting teams is a no-go in gnome-i18n policies. Be sure that the >> coordination team is taking the whole thing very serious and will try the >> best to resolve it but one of the first things we want is avoid splitting >> teams. > > So far only Johannes and Petr (both i18n coordination team members) have > publicly replied to this thread, but at this point I feel urged to share > with you that other coordination team members (myself included) are also > closely watching this discussion unfold. The coordination team is taking > this very serious and is currently discussing the matter in a private > thread. > > In the meantime: I totally agree with Johannes. Splitting teams is *not* > an option. Generally speaking, forking open source projects does not > work. Reasonable alternative options are currently under consideration > in aforementioned private discussion. > > — Wouter > > _______________________________________________ > gnome-i18n mailing list > gnome-i18n@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n > > _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
