Le lundi 26 octobre 2009 à 13:37 +0100, Christian Kellner a écrit : > Hi Claude, > > Gren replied on the 22nd of October. Maybe you missed that. I am > attaching Gren's reply.
Oh, sorry, I missed the answer (maybe stalled in the moderation queue). Hop, unobsoleted :-) Claude > On 26.10.2009, at 13:31, Claude Paroz wrote: > > > Le lundi 19 octobre 2009 à 20:01 +0200, Christian Kellner a écrit : > >> Hi everybody, > >> > >> I quit working for Scalix quite a while ago and I have no real clue > >> if > >> evolution-scalix is officially maintained by Scalix anymore. I am > >> therefore cc'ing Gren Elliot from Scalix/Xandros fame. > > > > One week, no answer = moved to "Obsolete" release. > > > > Claude > > > >> On 19.10.2009, at 11:15, Andre Klapper wrote: > >> > >>> CC'ing maintainer. > >>> > >>> > >>> Am Sonntag, den 18.10.2009, 20:22 -0200 schrieb Leonardo Ferreira > >>> Fontenelle: > >>>> Watching the commit log for the Scalix connector for Evolution, I > >>>> see > >>>> that in the last 1 year and 4 months all commits were done by > >>>> translators, except for two which were related to the .doap file. > >>>> Besides, there was no response an i18n bug I reported 16 months > >>>> ago. > >>>> > >>>> Which makes me think: could the translation commits be avoiding the > >>>> Git administrators to notice development is stalled? > >>> > >>> Why should git admins notice at all, and how? > >>>> > >>>> Anyway, I believe we should stop translating evolution-scalix, at > >>>> least for now. > > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Leonardo Ferreira Fontenelle <leonar...@gnome.org> > > > > > -- www.2xlibre.net _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
