Le lundi 13 août 2007 à 18:17 +1000, James Livingston a écrit : > On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 14:50 +0200, Mgr. Peter Tuharsky wrote: > > James "Doc" Livingston wrote / napísal(a): > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > I'm planning to do a new 0.11.x release of Rhythmbox (from svn trunk) in > > > the near future, so if anyone has any updated translations, getting them > > > into svn by the end of the coming weekend would be great. Rhythmbox > > > doesn't strictly follow the GNOME release schedule, but we're trying to > > > keep basically in line with it, so there shouldn't be too many string > > > changes before a 0.12 stable release. > > > > I have uploaded the SK translation using GNOME bugzilla, however seems > > that translation team leader is too busy to check it out. You can find > > the PO file there if You wish. > > After taking a while to figure out where the translation was in > bugzilla[0], there is a comment on the bug saying that it was based of a > very old POT file. > > Is the one attached to the bug better than what is currently in svn > trunk (and so should be committed), or is it not worth committing? > > [0] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463079
The msgfmt output is identical for the two files, so I don't think it's useful to commit the new file. Claude _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
