On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 14:50 +0200, Mgr. Peter Tuharsky wrote: > James "Doc" Livingston wrote / napĂsal(a): > > Hi everyone, > > > > I'm planning to do a new 0.11.x release of Rhythmbox (from svn trunk) in > > the near future, so if anyone has any updated translations, getting them > > into svn by the end of the coming weekend would be great. Rhythmbox > > doesn't strictly follow the GNOME release schedule, but we're trying to > > keep basically in line with it, so there shouldn't be too many string > > changes before a 0.12 stable release. > > I have uploaded the SK translation using GNOME bugzilla, however seems > that translation team leader is too busy to check it out. You can find > the PO file there if You wish.
After taking a while to figure out where the translation was in bugzilla[0], there is a comment on the bug saying that it was based of a very old POT file. Is the one attached to the bug better than what is currently in svn trunk (and so should be committed), or is it not worth committing? [0] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463079 Thanks, -- Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a perl script. _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n