On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 7:50 AM, James Starlight <jmsstarli...@gmail.com>wrote:

> In literature I found that the ussage of 1.0 cutoffs should give good
> results but in the antechamber manual I've seen that usages of 1.2 cutoofs
> ( with GAFF) should be used. So what cut-offs should I use for
> protein-ligand complexes done in amber ? (assuming that I simulate my
> system in the berger lipids )
>
>
>
Do a few test runs and see. I would think the cutoff value would more
strongly affect the lipids, not the ligand, whose interactions are
comparatively few and relatively local. If you use the Verlet cutoff scheme
in version 4.6, it's largely irrelevant since there will not be any
"missed" interactions either way.

-Justin

-- 

========================================

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540)
231-9080http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

========================================
-- 
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to