That paper suggests of using 1.0 nm for all cut-offs http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ct200491c
that seems strange to me because with gromos-56 I've used 1.2 nm cutoffs. James 2013/4/6 Mark Abraham <mark.j.abra...@gmail.com> > How about reading the literature on combining AMBER and Berger? :-) > > Mark > > On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 8:24 AM, James Starlight <jmsstarli...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > Dear Gromacs Users! > > > > > > I'm looking for cut-offs parameters which would be suitable for the > > simulation of the membrane proteins (bergers united-atom lipids) with the > > amber-99 force fields (full-atomic protein representation). I'd be > thankful > > to anyone who can provide me with such cut-offs for vdw as well as > coulomb > > interactions for that force field. > > > > > > > > James > > -- > > gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org > > http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users > > * Please search the archive at > > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! > > * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the > > www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. > > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists > > > -- > gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org > http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users > * Please search the archive at > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! > * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the > www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists > -- gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
