lloyd riggs wrote:
Dear All,
A question about data analysis. When Generating raw .xvg files of energies I
have found say 3-4 points out of 2000 (per run 11 total) is erroneous.
something like
20.43534
21.7657 22.212 -34.88 23.680
Something like that.
Where are these data from, and how did you conclude that the offending point was
erroneous?
Now is there a routine in handling these? I found when integrating all 11 it
makes several points error calculations double or triple at a single point.
Is it proper to remove these when submitting something to generate the smooth
curve, or are we supposed to include these?
You can't just throw away data you don't like without a more rigorous
statistical analysis. You should investigate the source of the weird point(s)
to see if they might, in fact, be legitimate or generated by an error somewhere.
-Justin
--
========================================
Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
========================================
--
gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
