On 17.10.2011 05:18, Mark Abraham wrote:
On 17/10/2011 7:04 AM, Mirco Wahab wrote:
On 10/16/2011 2:25 PM, Mark Abraham wrote:
On 15/10/2011 9:02 PM, Mirco Wahab wrote:
On 10/15/2011 1:15 AM, Mark Abraham wrote:
I use
...
...
...
OK, I can understand that. But if the options (-mtune ***, -msse2)
are not longer available with the actual free Intel Compiler suites,
shouldn't the cmake definitions be adapted to this fact in order
to avoid loads of compiler warnings?

If someone can identify a way to detect old and new, free and non-free compiler 
suites then we might consider it. Reality is that GROMACS spends a heavy 
majority of its time in loops written mostly in assembly code (using SSE or 
SSE2 if applicable), or in
the FFT library. Compiler performance makes a negligible contribution to 
performance of the rest, so it is really not worth while maintaining complex 
compiler tweaks.

OK,

I'll attach the error messages err.msg, 5.9 KB).
- cmake version 2.8.3
- gcc 4.5.1 x64 (Linux) (20101208)

With cmake 2.8.2 and icc 12.1.0 20110811 using the aforementioned flags, I get 
smooth installation of the git version of 4.5.5. Moreover, I don't even get
.../build/src/gmxlib/CMakeFiles/CMakeRelink.dir
being created. So I think there is something idiosyncratic about your tool 
chain that is at the root of this.

I replicated the error on another machine and already answered this
as a response to Szilárd. I really don't know what the reason is, maybe
I'm doing something really wrong. The only ray of hope: w/autoconf,
everything works fine, even giving one the subjective impression of
'closely controlling' the build process ;-)

Thanks & regards

M.
--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to